Why is Graham Potter's 3-4-3 no longer Chelsea's best long-term strategy?
if(acip_can_see_ads()) { $adCode = '

On this page, we will provide you with the most recent Chelsea news, transfer updates, highlights from previous matches, gossip and rumors news as it becomes available.

Why is Graham Potter's 3-4-3 no longer Chelsea's best long-term strategy?

if(acip_can_see_ads()) { $adCode = '
if(acip_can_see_ads()) { $adCode = '

Graham Potter 3-4-3 form, is the best for lineup, while Potter formation is the best for now, Graham Potter has won three matches at the same time, best of Graham Potter formation useful. Continue reading…

Without a doubt, Graham Potter’s decision to return to a back-three formation has resulted in three straight victories; however, this strategy may cause Chelsea problems in the future.
As Potter recently pointed out, several Chelsea players are ideal for this setup.

if(acip_can_see_ads()) { $adCode = '

Why is Graham Potter's 3-4-3 no longer Chelsea's best long-term strategy?

Being familiar with this framework, according to Mateo Kovacic, is also beneficial.

if(acip_can_see_ads()) { $adCode = '

So, why shouldn’t Chelsea simply stick with this formation?

The short answer is that the team has made too many investments in wide attackers to profit from this.

There are numerous other possibilities

Wingbacks such as Ben Chilwell and Reece James, who Paul Merson described as “really talented attacking players,” are frequently the ones who give the team width in a 3-4-3 formation.

However, this isn’t always the case because wing-backs may sometimes run in close formation rather than moving wide, which reduces their ability to provide crosses, and James in particular is a very good crosser.

Wingbacks or wingers

The two wide forwards behind the striker in this system will have to move more centrally to make room for these wing-backs.

Is it true that Graham Potter refused to sign Mudryk at Chelsea? Paul Merson elucidates why

Other players, such as Raheem Sterling, Mykhailo Mudryk, Noni Maduke, Hakim Ziyech, and Christian Pulisic, prefer to play on the wings. This applies to players like Joao Felix, Mason Mount, Kai Havertz, and possibly Christopher Nkunku, who is expected to join Chelsea this summer.

Ziyech and Pulisic may leave Chelsea at the end of the season, but the other players are almost certain to stay.

It’s worth noting that in the previous three games, both Sterling and Mudryk were forced to play false nine positions to allow Havertz to roam freely in the final third.

If Chelsea were looking for a new number nine, as some reports suggest, there would only be room for two attackers in the squad.

Why is Graham Potter's 3-4-3 no longer Chelsea's best long-term strategy?

Chilwell and James would lack flexibility because their primary role is that of protectors. Instead of being the main threat, they should play supporting roles in the assault. Chelsea specifically brought in Mudryk, Sterling, and Madueke for that purpose.

Opinion: 3 Ways Graham Potter could set up Chelsea’s XI(4-4-2), (3-5-2) or (4-2-1-2-1)

The opposing argument is that Potter recently attempted a back-four, which clearly did not work.

Chelsea, on the other hand, will have the opportunity to change that during the summer transfer window.

A new holding midfielder, for example, will allow club-record signing Enzo Fernandez to focus on developing as a playmaker. Kante, too, but in his case to pursue the ball and gain control of the situation.

What do you think about Graham Potter’s 3-4-3 formation? Is this the best formation for the club, or should he use a different formation?

Graham Potter, in my opinion, should switch to a 3-2-2-3 or 4-3-2-1 formation; what are your thoughts?

66 / 100
if(acip_can_see_ads()) { $adCode = '

By admin

%d bloggers like this: